Slackware vs Kubuntu: A Subjective Review
Long time fans of this space will be aware that I’m a Slacker. However, when something wasn’t working as easily as it could, I installed Kubuntu to see what the latest version (Hardy Heron) was like and whether it could tempt me to switch permanently.
Firstly, even though all Linux distros are pretty identical at heart (largely the same commands, file structures and so on) there are a number of differences that can make one set of users argue incessantly with another set. Firstly, Slackware is now the oldest distro still in use - Slackware first began in 1993, followed by Debian, followed by Red Hat. You will notice that I have left off Suse, that’s because it started life using a Slackware base and then used a Red Hat base. So in terms of “pure” distros, Slackware was first, followed closely by Debian, followed closely by Red Hat. In fact, almost all Linux distros use one of those three as their base, as shown on the graphical timeline. And to wind this paragraph up, Kubuntu is the KDE variant of Ubuntu, which is based on Debian. There may be a large number of available distributions out there, but there are very few distros to base them off.
In terms of approach and use, Kubuntu and Slackware are very different. The Slackware methodology is that almost everything should be done by hand: installing programs, configuring programs and so on. Kubuntu focuses on ease of use: installation of programs is via the Adept Package Manager and using the apt command. There are also wizards and you know when updates are available by the icon in your system tray. It is also notable that Slackware come with plain vanilla KDE whereas Kubuntu has a very attractive configuration of KDE installed.
Continue reading ‘Slackware vs Kubuntu: A Subjective Review’ »